SchoolProjectGuide

Copyright ©2024 SchoolProjectGuide

FRAUD IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND THE AUDITORS LIABILITY (A CASE STUDY OF ACCESS BANK PLC IN ENUGU

  • Department: MASS COMMUNICATION
  • Chapters: 1-5
  • Pages: 72
  • Attributes: Questionnaire, Data Analysis, Abstract
  • Views: 194
  •  :: Methodology: Primary Research
  • PRICE: ₦ 5,000
Get Complete Project

FRAUD IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTION AND THE AUDITORS LIABILITY (A CASE STUDY OF ACCESS BANK PLC IN ENUGU

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION 

1.1BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 

The problem of fraud in financial institution in Nigeria has remained one of the disturbing features of the banking sector.  The menace is of the great concern to regulatory authorities the government and the general public because financial institutions are the central of modern economy, the place of people wealth and supplier of credit, which lubricates the engine of growth of the entire economy.

According to Phil Britt 2010, banking fraud is as old as the industry itself, and it continuous to  be one of the larges expenses faced by many financial institution, then according to Virginia Garcia, research director for Needham, mass-based Tower group estimates that 30 percent to 50 percent of the industry’s and 55billion in annual operating losses is attributes to fraud.

According to Haris Chairman of Passmark security in Redwood city clif (2011).  The banking industry has spent the past year and a half determining what is the biggest problem phishing, pharming and Bust-out, he says that banks are using a greater array of information and multifactor analysis to lock down system when fraud schemes are detected, user names and passwords, should be supported in internet banking transaction with new and better ways of authenticating genuine customers and indentifying fraud artists trying to take over banks accounts, according to the summer update on identity theft from the federation deposit insurance corporation.

According to the federation trade commission (2010 August Second pg 13) fighting an almost up heard of term only three year ago, is the top internet fraud scheme.  Large national banks such as Citicorp and bank of America are among the most fighting financial institutions.  Banks have been on the alert for fighting scans for nearly two years.  They post information on their web sites warning customer about the dangers of fighting and notifying them that the financial institution itself will not seek customer identification information via-e-mail.

Then the federal Trade Commission (2011 August Second pg 13) also opined about pharming which involves a criminal infecting a PC or Domain name system DNS serve to redirect a user’s web browser automatically to a mirror site that looks like a financial institutions legitimate website, complete with account links, including ones asking for user names, passwords, and other sensitive customer data.

The third one is bust-out which penetrators wait their banks, the use stolen ID information to “bust-out” with an auto loan.  Garcia says that data management is critical for banks taking a holistic approach.  So banks are employing technologies that gather data in real time, cleans it and combine it with information from other systems.  “Those data that approach fraud management as a mandate to protect their reputation and built customer trust will also improve operational efficiencies and see significant pay back to their bottom lien through reduction of losses.The economic crimes units are responsible from significant frauds target against individual businesses and industries to includes: corporate fraud, mass marketing fraud, telemarketing, and pyramid schemes. The financial institution fraud unit is to identify, target, disrupt and dismantle criminal organizations and individuals engage fraud schemes which target our nation for institutions.  Areas investigated in the financial institution fraud include; financial institution failures, insider fraud, check fraud, counterfeit negotiable instruments, check kiting, loan fraud and mortgage fraud. In 2010, Association of certified Fraud Examiner (ACFE) estimated that fire percent of annual revenue was lost due to fraud.  Applying this five percent to the estimated 2010.  Gross domestic product would translate to approximately and 652 billion in fraud losses.  Other findings including tips which uncovered fourty four percent of the million dollar fraud which was more than twice the rate of best position to witness violation, questionable ethical standards.  After tips, the next most frequent detection of fraud was by accident 36.3 percent of small business cases were discovered by accident versus 25.5 percent for all case combined.

.